Papers
arxiv:2310.03051

How FaR Are Large Language Models From Agents with Theory-of-Mind?

Published on Oct 4, 2023
ยท Submitted by akhaliq on Oct 5, 2023
#1 Paper of the day
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

"Thinking is for Doing." Humans can infer other people's mental states from observations--an ability called Theory-of-Mind (ToM)--and subsequently act pragmatically on those inferences. Existing question answering benchmarks such as ToMi ask models questions to make inferences about beliefs of characters in a story, but do not test whether models can then use these inferences to guide their actions. We propose a new evaluation paradigm for large language models (LLMs): Thinking for Doing (T4D), which requires models to connect inferences about others' mental states to actions in social scenarios. Experiments on T4D demonstrate that LLMs such as GPT-4 and PaLM 2 seemingly excel at tracking characters' beliefs in stories, but they struggle to translate this capability into strategic action. Our analysis reveals the core challenge for LLMs lies in identifying the implicit inferences about mental states without being explicitly asked about as in ToMi, that lead to choosing the correct action in T4D. To bridge this gap, we introduce a zero-shot prompting framework, Foresee and Reflect (FaR), which provides a reasoning structure that encourages LLMs to anticipate future challenges and reason about potential actions. FaR boosts GPT-4's performance from 50% to 71% on T4D, outperforming other prompting methods such as Chain-of-Thought and Self-Ask. Moreover, FaR generalizes to diverse out-of-distribution story structures and scenarios that also require ToM inferences to choose an action, consistently outperforming other methods including few-shot in-context learning.

Community

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

This comment has been hidden

Bridging the Gap: Can Large Language Models Achieve Theory-of-Mind?

Links ๐Ÿ”—:

๐Ÿ‘‰ Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/@Arxflix
๐Ÿ‘‰ Twitter: https://x.com/arxflix
๐Ÿ‘‰ LMNT (Partner): https://lmnt.com/

By Arxflix
9t4iCUHx_400x400-1.jpg

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2310.03051 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 1

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2310.03051 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 6